“Fair warning: You may want to precede your first viewing of Japanese artist-filmmaker crossover wunderkind Takashi Murakami’s Jellyfish Eyes by reading the essay Glen Helfand has penned for Criterion’s Blu-ray release. If you like to walk on the wild side, go right ahead, check out the movie before Helfand, but you’re just increasing the odds that your takeaway from Murakami’s loopy, melodramatic genre mash will boil down to bafflement. Helfand’s writing gives viewers proper context for engaging with both Murakami as a creative type, and withJellyfish Eyes as a product of its era; asGodzilla is to Hiroshima, so Jellyfish Eyes is to the Fukushima natural and accompanying nuclear disasters of 2011. It’s also a charmingly bizarre cocktail that mixes kaijuflicks with Ghibli-brand magic, Pokémon, Sailor Moon, and probably a dozen or so other influences that aren’t quite as easily sussed out in a single sitting. If Murakami’s reference points are varied and odd, though, his thematic explorations—about human interactions with technology, the conservation of our planet, and the consequences of miscommunication—ring much more clearly. Jellyfish Eyes is an odd duck, but its substantive cuteness and earnestness should win over even less adventures cineastes.” (Via Paste Magazine.)
I really want to see this movie, but I’m hesitant to just blind-buy it.
I don’t normally advocate blind-buying, myself, but if any of the influences ticked off in that paragraph interest you, or if you’re a fan of either Murakami’s work or oddball Japanese cinema in general, this is a release worth checking out.
If you’re still tentative, and I don’t blame you, maybe wait until Criterion has a 50% sale to grab it.
I can only afford to buy Criterions during the 50% off sale! Haha
And I’m a fan of blind-buying (I’ve found some great stuff that way), but this one just makes me hesitant for some reason. I don’t know.
Hey, each their own. I typically only buy Criterions on my buy list during sales, too, because why wouldn’t you? (I should also say that when it comes to The Criterion Collection, I have fewer reservations about blind-buying; even if the film on the disc isn’t necessarily to my taste, the experience ends up being educational, and to me that’s value.)
Jellyfish Eyes is kind of a hard movie to evaluate, even for people who have seen it (though again, the essay on the Blu does help immensely with that). Sight unseen, it’s a daunting blind buy. But I’d say it’s worth it, next time there’s a sale. The whole release opened me up to Murakami and a wing of Japanese art I wasn’t familiar with.
I’m a huge fan of Japanese cinema (although not a “Japanophile”), but Japanese pop-art is a new area I’ve not explored (much like you said) and am very unfamiliar with.