Review: Brave, 2012, dir. Mark Andrews & Brenda Chapman

Brave, the latest offering from animation giant Pixar, comes to be defined very quickly by an odd tension struck between two different bodies: its studio and its pedigree. The very idea of Pixar, long-established as a font of creativity and raw talent put forth in service to compelling and original storytelling, tackling princess films and fairy tales is admittedly weird on its face; at a distance that move seems like a step back. But Brave, even when favoring thematic elements over narrative, comes endowed with all the soul, whimsy, and magic– both literal and figurative– that’s associated with the Pixar name. The film simply feels dressed down next to the more distinctly imaginative fare we expect from their brand, but maybe we’ve been spoiled on anthropomorphic robots, rats, and toys for too long.

In a way, Brave may be one of Pixar’s more daring pictures to date; when you are the cutting edge, taking on an enterprise that’s so deeply rooted in a very traditional style of storytelling seems like a risk. But there’s no rule in film against dealing in the familiar. In fact, familiarity can be a great thing when treated with the proper touches of imagination and ingenuity. In that regard, Brave should be seen as a success. Most of us are acquainted with Disney’s princess movies– Snow WhiteCinderella, and more recent entries like Tangled among countless others– and watching Pixar subvert their tropes and supplant them with a new vision of the princess character lifts the film into its own niche, which coincidentally nestles nicely within the rest of the studio’s body of work. Put simply, Brave is rebellious.

That defiance is housed in the heart of its heroine, Princess Merida (Kelly Macdonald, lively, coarse, and emotional). Fiery and independent, she refuses to be saddled down and forced into a life she’s unsuited for, and her stubborn temperament puts her at constant odds with her mother, Queen Elinor (Emma Thompson). Elinor believes in the propriety of ladylike pursuits, while Merida’s more content riding through the woods surrounding her home, practicing archery, and climbing mountains. The threat of betrothal to a son of the neighboring clans proves to be the last straw for Merida, though; desperate to retain her freedom and changer her mother’s mind on the matter, Merida employs the services of a daffy old witch (Julie Walters), and…

…well, that bit may be best left discovered by you. Oddly, Pixar’s marketing plan only revolves around the first act of the film. Nothing beyond that, aside from maybe one or two indistinct images, has infiltrated promotional trailers and TV spots (though you may want to stay away from the toy aisles in Wal-Mart and Target). Experiencing the second act development which drives the rest of the film feels akin to observing a pitcher toss a serious curve ball; Brave gets positively ursine as Merida and Elinor find themselves thrust together on a quest to undo the effects of the spell purchased from the aforementioned conjurer.

The story that follows hits a collection of expected beats; parent and child bond along the way, learning from one another and growing in significant ways, and of course they’re working under a rush-order to undo the witch’s hocus-pocus before it’s too late. To paraphrase a great man, though, it’s not what a film is about, it’s how it’s about it. Yes, Brave adheres to boilerplate story tropes and ideas, and for many fans so used to Pixar taking us through outer space or across the depths of the ocean, this may come as something of a disappointment. But the film also twists and manipulates them, giving Merida self-possession and agency to set her apart from her helpless predecessors. Merida needs no Prince Charming, and none arrives– just three dopes undeserving of her hand.

In fact, it’s that trio of undeveloped would-be suitors that represent one of Brave‘s stumbling blocks. While the journey Merida and Elinor undertakes is, in a word, wonderful, the hijinks that occur back at the castle– as Merida’s father, King Fergus (Billy Connolly), and the increasingly irate families of the spurned courters descend into ludicrous siege warfare with one another– taste undercooked. Though terrifically funny at times, the group of bumbling men don’t end up figuring into the overarching plot organically; when the time comes for Chapman and Andrews* to tie the two threads together, they do so using the most cumbersome knot possible. It’s a stroke of good luck– and storytelling– that the results don’t knock the entire film off-kilter or pollute Brave‘s moving climax.

Unsurprisingly, that’s because we spend very little time with these mostly undeveloped side characters. They’re not the point; we’re really here to watch our protagonist grow up. As with most Pixar films, what we see is window-dressing next to what we feel, though Brave happens to be outfitted with some of the best window-dressing in their output to date. This is a sterling, gorgeous display of animation; we can count every strand of hair in the flaming tangle resting on Merida’s brow, even as it bounces and whips about her, and every fur on the hide of Mor’du, the vicious, demonic bear responsible for taking Fergus’ leg in the beginning of the film and who stalks Merida and Elinor on their adventure. Watching an arrow bend as our heroine sends it into flight is alone as jaw-dropping as any spectacle left in the season.

High-quality animation is, of course, a given with Pixar– even if Brave hits some new heights of excellence in visual wizardry. Unfortunately, so too has high-quality storytelling. This is a blessing but primarily a curse; when you make a habit of producing movies like Wall-E and Up and Toy Story 2 and Finding Nemo so effortlessly, people come to treat excellence as par for the course, and something merely “good” as opposed to “great” becomes cause for concern (and a source of frustrating critical controversy). No, Brave doesn’t represent a new Pixar classic, but it’s still a good story well told. And sometimes, that’s enough.

*Aside: originally, Chapman had sole responsibility for directing, until vague creative differences led to Andrews being brought on-board. Make of that what you will, but Chapman deserves crediting alongside Andrews for her contributions here.


11 thoughts on “Review: Brave, 2012, dir. Mark Andrews & Brenda Chapman

  1. I get what you’re saying about the comparisons to Wall-E and Up (which are actually sitting on my need-to-see list still…) Even if this isn’t blowing people away with the novelty of it, it still deserves to be judged on its own merits. It sounds like when I get to see it I’ll enjoy it. What more can I ask for?

    • Right on, exactly. Pixar’s got a history of making great films, but I don’t think that means they shouldn’t just be able to make a “good” film– and besides, I think Brave comes quite close to some of their best works, even if it’s “lesser” Pixar.

      Though, the more I think about it, that term really just refers to scope, scale, and familiarity rather than quality. It’s a very good movie.

  2. LOL. First time I went to look you up on Go See Talk FIRST… and your review is over here!! 😀

    Anyways, I agree with you totally on the “Lack of originality”. Its not necessary for them to blaze new trails constantly, but on the other hand, I definitely felt the absence of it. Everytime there came a standard trope or something, it felt extra glaring to me. Unfair to this movie? Definitely. But it is what it is.

    And my primary explanation for why this one just feels “Really good” and not great. In fact, the only thing I could find really. Its a very solid piece of entertainment, actually, I enjoyed it quite a bit.

    I’m a little more forgiving of the “undercooked” clan war that busts out… its a sideplot, if even. Its just a comedic through line, thats all. I thought they did a good enough job with it.

    Great read, Andy

    • I just wrote a big huge comment to reply to this, and it got eaten. Go figure.

      Anyways, yeah, if we double up on GST I just post my review here so we’re not cluttering the site with multiple takes on the same film. I really should be more diligent about using Twitter to delineate what’s getting posted where.

      As for the lack of originality– I can understand what you’re talking about. But I also applaud your ability to recognize the unfairness. I can’t hold it against people if they expected more from Brave based on pedigree, but I appreciate that sense of self-awareness. I’ve read a number of reviews from critics that just do not allow the movie to exist on its own terms, so you’re a step ahead here.

      For me, I had no trouble divorcing Brave from the rest of Pixar’s body of work. I just expected a good film. And I got a very good film. Maybe it won’t stand next to a Wall-E, but it stands very well on its own feet. (And maybe repeat viewings will help the movie mature!)

      Oh, the lords– you’re partly right, and I do think that they got in some terrific gags with them (the tartan rappelling scene slew me). But they’re part of the stakes. Merida’s main concern is un-bewitching her mother, but she also has to keep the kingdom from falling into chaos, courtesy of her actions. When the two plot lines meet up, it just feels somewhat inelegant, and based on the way the sons react to Merida’s proclamation at the end, I think a bit more juice for each of them would have gone a long way toward making Brave slightly more robust.

      But it’s still very, very good on its own, and I couldn’t be happier about that! Thanks for stopping by bud. It’s been a while!

      • Yeah, I try to check in and see what you’ve got going on as best I can, I’m sure you know how it goes. 😀

        Been trying to be sure to hit the big release reviews at least… on some of the other ones, I just havent seen the films.

  3. Pingback: Brave is gorgeously told fairy tale! And the short La Luna is amazing! « nediunedited

  4. Pingback: Weekly Weblinks: Spidey, Scots, and Rocker Snots | Morgan on Media

  5. I saw this a week ago and enjoyed it. I think a lot of the criticism stems from the fact that Pixar is involved. If this movie only had the Disney logo on it, I think a lot of folks would talk about how Disney went back to their roots and what not, not that the movie is a bit generic and predictable.

    • You’re right about that, though I think that’s maybe just people looking over at Pixar’s body of work with rose-colored glasses. Their batting average is pretty strong, for certain, but not every film in the studio’s body of work measures up to their best– in fact I’d argue that as much of their output can be called “good” as “great/classic”.

      The joy of Pixar lies in how the great variety in their work lets us all pick and choose what we deem their “best”. But I think the people who are treating Brave as a step down are really ignoring the fact that not everything the studio has made is a masterpiece.

    • There’s an argument out there that the hate comes from the fact that this is a woman-driven film, but I think that’s bogus. The real problem, if you ask me, is that people expect Pixar to produce the best animated picture of the year every single year, and when they make something that’s just “good” and not “great”, those people revolt.

      Brave, therefore, isn’t allowed to exist on its own terms and merits, which is woefully unfair because it’s well worth watching.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s